The Transformation of Britain
Many of our readers are convinced that the demographic transformation of Britain was deliberate. Some of them think that it was a communist plot to undermine our nation, others think it was capitalist greed for cheap labour. I think it was a combination of misplaced idealism, post-imperial guilt, and political naivety
The Labour Party government that passed the British Nationality Act in 1948 embraced all three of these attitudes. They imported colonial subjects to help rebuild our war damaged country without regard for the future. They probably never imagined that entire cities like Leicester and Birmingham would be completely taken over by immigrants.
The Labour Party's roots were in Methodism and Marxism. They believed that we are all God's children and that class not race was important. Their beliefs inspired them to pass The British Nationality Act of 1948.
The Tories welcomed immigrants as cheap labour, but some of them, including Winston Churchill, were worried for the future. Individual MPs like Harold Soref, Cyril Osborne, and Enoch Powell (pictured) called for an end to the influx, but the mainstream Tory Party was just as racially unconscious as their Labour and Liberal opponents.
Oswald Mosley opposed coloured immigration from the start. He called for the repatriation of mostly West Indian immigrants when it would still have been possible. He stood for Parliament in the 1959 general election in Notting Hill, but the public failed to back him and the established parties; Labour, Tory and Liberal, all condemned him.
Now, sixty years later, a populist-nationalist party under Nigel Farage is competing for votes with the Old Gang. Farage is careful not to mention race, he concentrates on Poles and Romanians, but the public are flocking to him. They are the same people who voted for Brexit in the hope of stopping immigration; instead it has more than doubled.
It's tempting to believe that a cabal of rootless cosmopolitans planned the replacement of the native population of the UK with Africans and Asians. The theory ticks all the boxes but I believe it was stupidity rather than wickedness that enabled it.
It's unbelievable for those of us who have opposed non-European immigration all our lives to see established politicians jumping on the bandwagon, not for love of race and nation, but to save their parliamentary seats, their inflated salaries, and their privileged positions.
Britain is supposed to be governed by the People, but we are actually governed by big business interests that control Parliament with threats, inducements and donations. These big businessmen don't care if their workers are black, brown or white, as long as they work for minimum wages.
There may be light at the end of the tunnel. The rise of nationalist parties throughout Europe, and the Trump administration in the USA, can only help us to reform our open door immigration policy.
Those of us who want to preserve our race and culture are abused as 'racists', but what does that really mean? Personally I am not a racist, at least not in the sense that I look down on other races. I just want Britain to be a European country as it always has been. We could have absorbed reasonable numbers of Third World immigrants, but the millions that arrived on our shores are far too many to be assimilated.
Our lethargic politicians are at last beginning to take an interest. They are sixty years too late but we might still stem the tide and save what's left of our way of life.
A Mosleyite
replies to White Voice No 54
Dear Editor
Thank you
for sending me your interesting magazine.
Some points
I would like to make on the “Mosley or Leese” debate.
1 After the Red/Jewish violence at the
Blackshirt Olympia rally in June 1934, Oswald Mosley banned Jews from BUF
membership.
2 Arnold Leese accepted Mosley’s
invitation to speak at a New Party meeting in 1932 on the theme “The Blindness
of British Police under the Jewish Money Power.”
3 In 1936 Mosley expanded the title of
his movement to the British Union of Fascists and National Socialists (BUF)
under the influence and popularity of Hitler’s NSDAP in Germany.
4 Leese was far more extreme and anti Jewish than even the Nazis themselves (who accepted half Jews such as SS founding member No2 Emil Maurice, Hitler’s friend, and comrade from Landsberg Prison from the early days of the NSDAP). Leese wrote in the IFL manifesto “Mightier yet: The Policy of the Imperial Fascist League”. (1935) that Jews who left Madagascar after being deported there by an IFL government would have to face the “death penalty.” Mosley proposed in his book “Tomorrow We Live” (1938) and Mick Clarke wrote in the BUFNS pamphlet “Britain and Jewry” (1939), that Jews who abuse our hospitality would be resettled in a new homeland “alternative to Palestine which is already the home of the Arabs.”
5 Mosley’s Union Movement was the first party to propose the financially-assisted repatriation of non immigrants to good jobs and homes in the West Indies, Africa and Asia in 1952.
6 After the Brothers’ War of 1939-1945, ex-Blackshirt and ex-serviceman, AK Chesterton (who fought against Germany and broke with Mosley in opposition to the BUFNS Peace campaign) wrote a book “The Tragedy of anti-Semitism” (1948) with the Jew Joseph Leftwitch. AKC became the first leader of the National Front in 1967 which has always taken an anti-United Europe line against Mosley’s “Europe a Nation” vision splendid. I note with interest that your National Action Party (NAP) of the eighties used Mosley’s Flash and Circle emblem and had a policy of “Europe aly” which wa Famis far better in my opinion than the negative narrow “nationalism” of the NF and BNP. I was further surprised after reading your autobiography “Memoirs of a Street Soldier” how strong and active the NAP was at the time with meetings attended by 100 or more Nationalists and NAP stewards wearing uniform and many NAP street demonstrations in London and elsewhere.
Yours
sincerely
Roger Bartlett
EO: Roger Bartlett is the pen name of Robert Best, a writer who has contributed to 'Comrade', 'Heritage and Destiny' and various websites. 'White Voice' was a nationalist magazine edited by Eddy Morrison.
Message from America - Paul Stockwell
What I objected to was Mosley's addiction to Keynesian economics, it is the basis of globalization.
Whether he succeeds or not, it is good that a pragmatic President like Trump is challenging the accepted global view of things. Let's face it Europe and the UK are finished. The flooding of the continent by military age Islamic men and their families has tipped the scale. Western Civilization which fostered innovation, philosophy, talent, and almost every scientific achievement is finished.
I'm so glad I live in a Nation like the US. I feel for the future of my children and grandchildren living in what will soon be the "New Caliphate."
EO: I have known Paul Stockwell (not his real name) since 1957 when we both attended Archbishop Temple's School in Lambeth Road. We were both Empire Loyalists. Paul emigrated to the US some forty years ago. Oswald Mosley advocated Keynesian economics when the UK was still an important industrial nation with fiscal potential. His vision of a self-sufficient Europe was the antithesis of globalization. President Donald Trump has got some good ideas but his territorial ambitions and protectionist policies are alarming. I hope that you are wrong about the Third World invasion and that our race and culture survives and prospers on both sides of the Atlantic.
From the Archives: Europe for the Europeans - JW Baillie - 'Action' Supporting Union Movement, August 1st 1975
The economic problems of divided Europe will be solved by political union. A self-contained economy will be outside the commodity speculation that has caused steep rises in world prices under the present system. Sweated imports from the East will be excluded and the massive bargaining power of 300 million European customers will ensure fair prices for such imports as might still be required.
But such a Europe will still be doomed to collapse and failure unless the growing problem of non-European immigration is tackled.
There are now millions of African, Asian and Caribbean migrants in Britain, France, Germany, Holland and other European countries. These people have been cruelly exploited as cheap labour without regard for their long-term welfare or that of native Europeans. Already the inevitable tensions of this multiracial situation have been expressed in violence and death.
Only the warped theoreticians of the race relations industry would deny that the assimilation of these immigrants is impossible. Britons and other Europeans who have been the victims of large-scale immigrant settlement know that this policy is socially destructive and bound to end in disaster.
We are told by apologetic politicians of the old parties that it is now too late to reverse the flood, that "there are too many here now." This of course is nonsense. There are plenty of historical precedents for mass repatriation of whole populations in the past thirty years.
Thirteen million refugees from East Europe were taken in by West Germany after the last world war. More than half a million Asians have been exchanged by India, Pakistan and Bangladesh after their mutual conflict. Over a million 'pieds noirs' were repatriated to France after that country abandoned Algeria. Nearly one million Portuguese have been brought home from Africa, and as I write are arriving in Lisbon at the rate of two thousand a day.
Indeed, an entirely new state has been created in this way: the state of Israel. Over three million Jews have been repatriated to their spiritual homeland, and this has been hailed as an historic achievement. Russia, which bans its Jews from going to Israel, is universally condemned for 'barbaric' behaviour. If it is not only possible but considered a very good thing that millions of Jews should go to Israel, why does not the same standard apply to repatriation to their homelands of Europe's immigrants?
Clearly, that solution is both possible and essential now that they are unwanted in a Europe facing unemployment and depression. Europe on a full production economy will have both the technology and financial capacity to launch a great programme of humane repatriation, coupled with aid to the developing nations who would benefit from the return of their skilled workers.
If this is not done they will remain as an unwanted alien minority, when we shall experience the same inter-racial strife that now threatens to tear the United States apart.
EO: Nothing much has changed in the last fifty years, except that our politicians have finally accepted that the multiracial experiment was a mistake. Since Brexit the Poles and other East Europeans have stopped coming to the UK but we are being overrun by Indians as a result of Keir Starmer's trade deal with India. People follow goods across borders.
UKIP - Kev Bryan
This article by Kev Bryan who was deputy leader of the National Front was posted on Eddy Morrison's 'Nationalist Sentinel' website in January 2013, it concerns Nigel Farage who led UKIP, the forerunner of Reform UK. Its warning to nationalists is still valid.
In recent elections the UK Independence Party (UKIP) have seen an increase in their vote. Today I have seen posts on Facebook where nationalists see the increased UKIP vote and Farage's tough stance on Islam as a reason to vote UKIP if there are no other nationalist parties standing in their area.
I have also recently seen on forums how people believe that the increase in UKIP's vote makes them think people are turning are turning to nationalism.
Let us examine what a fallacy this is and why the increased UKIP vote is certainly no reason for cause celebration.
UKIP was founded in 1993. They were founded as a party whose prime aim was to get Britain out of the EU. Because of their stance on the EU many members of the public saw UKIP as a right wing party and also believed that they were patriotic and against immigration, but the truth is UKIP class non-whites living in Britain as British. These are their own words taken from their own website. "We believe the government of Britain should be for the people, by the people, regardless of their creed or colour."
So there you have it, if you are Black, Brown or Yellow, if you live in Britain you are British, now I say live and not born because the wording in that UKIP statement says "all the people" it does not even go so far as to say "the people born in Britain."
After reading that on their website I though I would examine their policies on immigration. Going on their policy section I had to go to page 4 of 5 to find their policies on immigration and asylum. There are pieces on there that have moderate nationalist tones and some of it would sound positive to the patriot, but to those who care about the future of our race it would make horrendous reading.
You have to Google UKIP and in the writing underneath the top search it states: "Libertarian non-racist party seeking Britain's withdrawal from the European Union."
Recently Farage has taken a tougher stance on Islam but let's not be fooled by this, most mainstream politicians like to come over as supposedly opposed to militant Islam. Again, with this tough stance on Islam Farage will win the hearts of many patriots and would be NF/BNP voters as these cowards see UKIP as a safe bet. Most of them would still vote UKIP even if they put up an Asian candidate in their area.
What Farage will not tackle is the subject of Zionism and Zionist control. Farage openly states that his party is trying to gate-keep any real resistance against International Zionist Influence. His party is fanatically "anti racist" and aims to absorb voters from turning to true Nationalism
Last year Farage also stated: "We have to stop the evil Golden Dawn."
So there you have it.
My advice to those nationalists that say they will vote UKIP if there is no NF/BNP candidate standing where they live is: "Do not waste your vote on just another mainstream party."
Get out there and join the National Front, help us build a mass movement, do not give the time of day to stooges like Nigel Farage.
This year the National Front will be contesting as many County Council seats as possible. If nationalists who talk about voting UKIP got of their backsides and decided to join us and stand for us we would be standing a whole lot more candidates.
Nation Revisited - https://nationrevisited.blogspot.com
European Outlook
All articles are by Bill Baillie unless otherwise stated. The opinions of guest writers are entirely their own. The editor reserves the right to shorten or otherwise amend articles submitted for publication. We seek reform by lawful means according to the UN Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19: